0.6 Basic Inequalities in One Variable
0.6.1 Linear Inequalities
We now turn our attention to linear inequalities. Unlike linear equations which admit at most one solution, the solutions to linear inequalities are generally intervals of real numbers. While the solution strategy for solving linear inequalities is the same as with solving linear equations, we need to remind ourselves that, should we decide to multiply or divide both sides of an inequality by a negative number, we need to reverse the direction of the inequality. In the example below, we work not only some `simple’ linear inequalities in the sense there is only one inequality present, but also some `compound’ linear inequalities which require us to revisit the notions of intersection and union.
Example 0.6.1
Example 0.6.1.1
Solve the following inequalities for the indicated variable.
Solve for  :
: 
Solution:
Solve for  :
:  .
.
We begin by clearing denominators. Then we gather all of the terms containing  to one side of the inequality and put the remaining terms on the other.
 to one side of the inequality and put the remaining terms on the other.
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} \dfrac{7-8x}{2} & \geq & 4x + 1 & \\ [8pt] 2\left(\dfrac{7-8x}{2}\right) & \geq & 2(4x + 1) & \text{Multiply by $2$} \\ [10pt] \dfrac{\cancel{2}(7-8x)}{\cancel{2}} & \geq & 2(4x) + 2(1) & \text{Distribute} \\ [3pt] 7 - 8x & \geq & 8x + 2 & \\ (7-8x) + 8x-2 & \geq & 8x+2 + 8x -2 & \text{Add $8x$, subtract $2$} \\ 7 - 2 - 8x + 8x & \geq & 8x + 8x + 2 - 2 & \text{Rearrange terms} \\ 5 & \geq & 16x & \text{$8x + 8x = (8+8)x = 16x$} \\ [3pt] \dfrac{5}{16} & \geq & \dfrac{16x}{16} & \text{Divide by the coefficient of $x$} \\[8pt] \dfrac{5}{16} & \geq & x & \\ \end{array} \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-2d6f8eccfef326ec021937d159fb7029_l3.png)
We get  or, said differently,
 or, said differently,  . We express this set[1] of real numbers as
. We express this set[1] of real numbers as ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left(-\infty, \frac{5}{16}\right]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-d64e068391b1837786ff3b92f937a22c_l3.png) .
.
Though not required to do so, we could partially check our answer by substituting  and a few other values in our solution set (
 and a few other values in our solution set ( , for instance) to make sure the inequality holds. (It also isn’t a bad idea to choose an
, for instance) to make sure the inequality holds. (It also isn’t a bad idea to choose an  , say
, say  , to see that the inequality doesn’t hold there.) The only real way to actually show that our answer works for all values in our solution set is to start with
, to see that the inequality doesn’t hold there.) The only real way to actually show that our answer works for all values in our solution set is to start with  and reverse all of the steps in our solution procedure to prove it is equivalent to our original inequality.
 and reverse all of the steps in our solution procedure to prove it is equivalent to our original inequality.
Example 0.6.1.2
Solve the following inequalities for the indicated variable.
Solve for  :
: 
Solution:
Solve for  :
:  .
.
We have our first example of a `compound’ inequality. The solutions to
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \dfrac{3}{4} \leq \dfrac{7-y}{2} < 6 \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-bd57a7d96d79076429a69843636c7414_l3.png)
must satisfy
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \dfrac{3}{4} \leq \dfrac{7-y}{2} \qquad \text{\underline{and}} \qquad \dfrac{7-y}{2} < 6\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-c11c3e67a8954d491a9e45b8064e610b_l3.png)
One approach is to solve each of these inequalities separately, then intersect their solution sets. While this method works (and will be used later for more complicated problems), our variable  appears only in the middle expression so we can proceed by working both inequalities at once:
 appears only in the middle expression so we can proceed by working both inequalities at once:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} \dfrac{3}{4} \leq & \dfrac{7-y}{2} & < 6 & \\ [10pt] 4\left(\dfrac{3}{4} \right) \leq & 4\left( \dfrac{7-y}{2}\right) & < 4(6) & \text{Multiply by $4$} \\ [12pt] \dfrac{\cancel{4} \cdot 3}{\cancel{4}} \leq & \dfrac{\cancelto{2}{4}(7-y)}{\cancel{2}} & < 24 & \\ [5pt] 3 \leq & 2(7-y) & < 24 & \\ 3 \leq & 2(7)-2y & < 24 & \text{Distrbute}\\ 3 \leq & 14-2y & < 24 & \\ 3 -14 \leq & (14-2y) - 14 & < 24 - 14 & \text{Subtract $14$}\\ -11 \leq & -2y & < 10 & \\ [3pt] \dfrac{-11}{-2} \geq & \dfrac{-2y}{-2} & > \dfrac{10}{-2} & \text{Divide by the coefficient of $y$} \\ [-5pt] & & & \text{Reverse inequalities} \\ [-3pt] \dfrac{11}{2} \geq & y & > -5 & \\ \end{array} \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-51f854ab369f3aee30f78c1d488babbf_l3.png)
Our final answer is  , or, said differently,
, or, said differently,  . In interval notation, this is
. In interval notation, this is ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left( -5, \frac{11}{2} \right]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-2af30d9a1251d93594bcfa8f238dac0e_l3.png) .
.
We could check the reasonableness of our answer as before, and the reader is encouraged to do so.
Example 0.6.1.3
Solve the following inequalities for the indicated variable.
Solve for  :
: 
Solution:
Solve for  :
:  .
.
We have another compound inequality and what distinguishes this one from our previous example is that  appears on both sides of both inequalities. In this case, we need to create two separate inequalities and find all of the real numbers
 appears on both sides of both inequalities. In this case, we need to create two separate inequalities and find all of the real numbers  which satisfy both
 which satisfy both
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[2t-1 \leq 4-t \textit{  and  } 4-t < 6t + 1.\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-4db2515f7eb7d51fd46ef2ab8b49a510_l3.png)
The first inequality,
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rcl} 2t-1 &\leq& 4-t \\ 3t &\leq& 5 \\ t \leq \frac{5}{3} \end{array} \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-72e7a53b83462cd80fc041b95ab5bc18_l3.png)
The second inequality,
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rcl} 4-t &<& 6t+1 \\ 3 &<& 7t \\t &>& \frac{3}{7} \end{array} \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-3a175d00b2261bbd0c1d699898e9cb91_l3.png)
Thus our solution is all real numbers  with
 with  and
 and  , or, writing this as a compound inequality,
, or, writing this as a compound inequality,  . Using interval notation,[2] we express our solution as
. Using interval notation,[2] we express our solution as ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left( \frac{3}{7}, \frac{5}{3} \right]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-89807ab458cde42af58173b7a3ace92c_l3.png) .
.
Example 0.6.1.4
Solve the following inequalities for the indicated variable.
Solve for  :
: 
Solution:
Solve for  :
:  .
.
As before, with this inequality we have no choice but to solve each inequality individually and intersect the solution sets. Starting with the leftmost inequality, we first note that in the term  , the vinculum of the square root extends over the
, the vinculum of the square root extends over the  only, meaning the
 only, meaning the  is not part of the radicand. In order to avoid confusion, we will write
 is not part of the radicand. In order to avoid confusion, we will write  as
 as  .
.
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} 5 + x\sqrt{7} & \leq & 4x+1 & \\ (5 + x\sqrt{7} ) -4x - 5 & \leq& (4x + 1) - 4x - 5 & \text{Subtract $4x$ and $5$} \\ x\sqrt{7} - 4x + 5 - 5 & \leq & 4x - 4x + 1 - 5 & \text{Rearrange terms} \\ x(\sqrt{7} - 4) & \leq & -4 & \text{Factor} \\ \end{array} \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-f9cdb7a87d8396b4adcfb9fd49f110c6_l3.png)
At this point, we need to exercise a bit of caution because the number  is negative.[3]
 is negative.[3]
When we divide by it the inequality reverses:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} x(\sqrt{7} - 4) & \leq & -4 & \\[3pt] \dfrac{x(\sqrt{7}-4)}{\sqrt{7}-4} & \geq & \dfrac{-4}{\sqrt{7} - 4} & \text{Divide by the coefficient of $x$} \\ [-8pt] & & & \text{Reverse inequalities} \\ [-3pt] x & \geq & \dfrac{-4}{\sqrt{7} - 4} & \\ [10pt] x & \geq & \dfrac{-4}{-(4 - \sqrt{7})} & \\ [12pt] x & \geq & \dfrac{4}{4 -\sqrt{7}} & \\ \end{array} \]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-4870b5ad9a1f48448e1569ead9eb3589_l3.png)
We’re only half done because we still have the rightmost inequality to solve.
Fortunately, that one seems rather mundane:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rcl} 4x+1 &\leq& 8 \\ x &\leq& \frac{7}{4} \end{array}\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-f773794336e91e6d7784adf4bcc14f81_l3.png)
without too much incident.
Our solution is  and
 and  .
.
We may be tempted to write  and call it a day but that would be nonsense! To see why, notice that
 and call it a day but that would be nonsense! To see why, notice that  is between
 is between  and
 and  so
 so  is between
 is between  and
 and  . In particular, we get
. In particular, we get  . On the other hand,
. On the other hand,  . This means that our `solutions’ have to be simultaneously greater than
. This means that our `solutions’ have to be simultaneously greater than  AND less than
 AND less than  which is impossible.
 which is impossible.
Therefore, this compound inequality has no solution, which means we did all that work for nothing.
Example 0.6.1.5
Solve the following inequalities for the indicated variable.
Solve for  :
:  or
 or 
Solution:
Solve for  :
:  or
 or  .
.
Our last example is yet another compound inequality but here, instead of the two inequalities being connected with the conjunction `and‘, they are connected with `or‘, which indicates that we need to find the union of the results of each.
Starting with  , we get
, we get  , which gives[4]
, which gives[4]  .
.
The second inequality,  , becomes
, becomes  , which reduces to
, which reduces to  .
.
Our solution set consists of all real numbers  with
 with  or
 or  . In interval notation, this is
. In interval notation, this is ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com (-\infty, -90] \cup [510, \infty)](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-9fc35f5529abbe159b2334dc8321b714_l3.png) .
.
0.6.2 Absolute Value Inequalities
We now turn our attention to solving some basic inequalities involving the absolute value. Suppose we wished to solve  . Geometrically, we are looking for all of the real numbers whose distance from 0 is less than 3 units. We get
. Geometrically, we are looking for all of the real numbers whose distance from 0 is less than 3 units. We get  , or in interval notation,
, or in interval notation,  . Suppose we are asked to solve
. Suppose we are asked to solve  instead. Now we want the distance between
 instead. Now we want the distance between  and
 and  to be greater than
 to be greater than  units. Moving in the positive direction, this means
 units. Moving in the positive direction, this means  . In the negative direction, this puts
. In the negative direction, this puts  . Our solutions would then satisfy
. Our solutions would then satisfy  or
 or  . In interval notation, we express this as
. In interval notation, we express this as  .
.


Generalizing this notion, we get the following:
Theorem 0.8 Inequalities Involving Absolute Value
 Let  be a real number.
 be a real number.
- If  , , is equivalent to is equivalent to . .
- If  , , has no solution. has no solution.
- If  , , is equivalent to is equivalent to or or . .
- If  , , is true for all real numbers. is true for all real numbers.
If the inequality we’re faced with involves ` ‘ or `
‘ or ` ,’ we can combine the results of Theorem 0.8 with Theorem 0.4 as needed.
,’ we can combine the results of Theorem 0.8 with Theorem 0.4 as needed.
Strategy for Solving Inequalities Involving Absolute Value
In order to solve an inequality involving the absolute value of a quantity  :
:
- Isolate the absolute value on one side of the inequality.
- Apply Theorem 0.8.
Example 0.6.2
Example 0.6.2.1
Solve the following inequalities.
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left|x-\sqrt[4]{5} \right| > 1](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-3a82ad5ff340af5fe6c3a978c9e8ed6f_l3.png)
Solution:
Solve ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left|x-\sqrt[4]{5} \right| > 1](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-3a82ad5ff340af5fe6c3a978c9e8ed6f_l3.png) for
 for  .
.
From Theorem 0.8, ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left|x-\sqrt[4]{5} \right| > 1](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-3a82ad5ff340af5fe6c3a978c9e8ed6f_l3.png) is equivalent to
 is equivalent to ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com x-\sqrt[4]{5} < -1](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-3ccb8ea89cf83321160524c6b38b7755_l3.png) or
 or ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com x-\sqrt[4]{5} > 1](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-542cf54bc5ea337c03d34e89f7be9cc6_l3.png) .
.
Solving this compound inequality, we get ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com x < -1 + \sqrt[4]{5}](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-15dfafc887bdf5ddb9f36b8d128db339_l3.png) or
 or ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com x > 1 + \sqrt[4]{5}](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-1165b35e84213e0e20d7391b4cc70a90_l3.png) .
.
Our answer, in interval notation, is: ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left(-\infty,-1 + \sqrt[4]{5} \right) \cup \left(1 + \sqrt[4]{5}, \infty \right)](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-deab87405f5c2981b8dddc72b017d1c2_l3.png) .
.
As with linear inequalities, we can only partially check our answer by selecting values of  both inside and outside of the solution intervals to see which values of
 both inside and outside of the solution intervals to see which values of  satisfy the original inequality and which do not.
 satisfy the original inequality and which do not.
Example 0.6.2.2
Solve the following inequalities.

Solution:
Solve  for
 for  .
.
Our first step in solving  is to isolate the absolute value.
 is to isolate the absolute value.
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} \dfrac{4 - 2|2x+1|}{4} & \geq & -\sqrt{3} & \\ [5pt] 4 - 2|2x+1| & \geq & -4\sqrt{3} & \text{Multiply by $4$} \\ - 2|2x+1| & \geq & -4-4\sqrt{3} & \text{Subtract $4$} \\ |2x+1| & \leq & \dfrac{-4-4\sqrt{3}}{-2} & \text{Divide by $-2$, reverse the inequality} \\ [8pt] |2x+1| & \leq & 2 + 2\sqrt{3} & \text{Reduce} \\ \end{array}\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-e41ff751d7b73eddd7464367188a6aef_l3.png)
Due to the fact that we’re dealing with ` ‘ instead of just `
‘ instead of just ` ,’ we can combine Theorems 0.8 and 0.4 to rewrite this last inequality as:[5]
,’ we can combine Theorems 0.8 and 0.4 to rewrite this last inequality as:[5]  .
.
Subtracting the ` ‘ across both inequalities gives
‘ across both inequalities gives  , which reduces to
, which reduces to 
In interval notation this reads as ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left[\frac{-3-2\sqrt{3}}{2}, \frac{1+2\sqrt{3}}{2}\right]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-af97a3dc35263eab38c3430e3e8d86fd_l3.png) .
.
Example 0.6.2.3
Solve the following inequalities.

Solution:
Solve  for
 for  .
.
There are two absolute values in  , so we cannot directly apply Theorem 0.8 here. Notice, however, that
, so we cannot directly apply Theorem 0.8 here. Notice, however, that  . Using this, we get:
. Using this, we get:
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} |2x - 1| & \leq & 3|4 - 8x| - 10 & \\ |2x - 1| & \leq & 3|(-4)(2x-1)| - 10 & \text{Factor}\\ |2x - 1| & \leq & 3|-4||2x-1| - 10 & \text{Product Rule}\\ |2x - 1| & \leq & 12|2x-1| - 10 & \\ -11|2x - 1| & \leq & - 10 & \text{Subtract $12|2x-1|$} \\ |2x - 1| & \geq & \dfrac{10}{11} & \text{Divide by $-11$ and reduce} \\ \end{array}\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-9ce772f94a549cb6f03bad5f316785c4_l3.png)
Now we are allowed to invoke Theorems 0.4 and 0.8 and write the equivalent compound inequality:  or
 or  .
.
We get  or
 or  , which when written with interval notation becomes
, which when written with interval notation becomes ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left(-\infty, \frac{1}{22}\right] \cup \left[\frac{21}{22}, \infty\right)](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-505d9d46fba46690ce2528ca6227a630_l3.png) .
.
Example 0.6.2.4
Solve the following inequalities.

Solution:
Solve  for
 for  .
.
The inequality  differs from the previous example in exactly one respect: on the right side of the inequality, we have `
 differs from the previous example in exactly one respect: on the right side of the inequality, we have ` ‘ instead of `
‘ instead of ` .’
.’
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} |2x - 1| & \leq & 3|4 - 8x| + 10 & \\ |2x - 1| & \leq & 3|(-4)(2x-1)| + 10 & \text{Factor}\\ |2x - 1| & \leq & 3|-4||2x-1| + 10 & \text{Product Rule}\\ |2x - 1| & \leq & 12|2x-1| + 10 & \\ -11|2x - 1| & \leq & + 10 & \text{Subtract $12|2x-1|$} \\ |2x - 1| & \geq & -\dfrac{10}{11} & \text{Divide by $-11$ and reduce} \\ \end{array}\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-3700b0d59d0939c987b6e6623e25b3e3_l3.png)
The resulting inequality is always true. (Absolute value is, by definition, a distance and hence always  or greater.)
 or greater.)
Thus our solution to this inequality is all real numbers.
Example 0.6.2.5
Solve the following inequalities.

Solution:
Solve  for
 for  .
.
To solve  , we rewrite it as the compound inequality:
, we rewrite it as the compound inequality:  and
 and  .
.
The first inequality,  , can be re-written as
, can be re-written as  so it is equivalent to
 so it is equivalent to  or
 or  .
.
Thus the solution to  is
 is  or
 or  , which in interval notation is
, which in interval notation is  .
.
For  , we combine the results of Theorems 0.4 and 0.8 to get
, we combine the results of Theorems 0.4 and 0.8 to get  so that
 so that  , or
, or ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com [-4,6]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-f9491835f4a9d52bd61896f6c1c7831f_l3.png) .
.
Our solution to  is comprised of values of
 is comprised of values of  which satisfy both parts of the inequality, so we intersect
 which satisfy both parts of the inequality, so we intersect  with
 with ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com [-4,6]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-f9491835f4a9d52bd61896f6c1c7831f_l3.png) to get our final answer
 to get our final answer ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com [-4,-1) \cup (3,6]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-88dc9aaee018d71723beca1fd517fd73_l3.png) .
.
Example 0.6.2.6
Solve the following inequalities.

Solution:
Solve  for
 for  .
.
Our first hope when encountering  is that we can somehow combine the two absolute value quantities as we’d done in earlier examples. We leave it to the reader to show, however, that no matter what we try to factor out of the absolute value quantities, what remains inside the absolute values will always be different.
 is that we can somehow combine the two absolute value quantities as we’d done in earlier examples. We leave it to the reader to show, however, that no matter what we try to factor out of the absolute value quantities, what remains inside the absolute values will always be different.
At this point, we take a step back and look at the equation in a more general way: we are adding two absolute values together and wanting the result to be less than or equal to  . The absolute value of anything is always
. The absolute value of anything is always  or greater, so there are no solutions to:
 or greater, so there are no solutions to:  .
.
Is it possible that  ? Only if there is an
? Only if there is an  where
 where  and
 and  at the same time.[6]
 at the same time.[6]
The first equation holds only when  , while the second holds only when
, while the second holds only when  . Alas, we have no solution.
. Alas, we have no solution.
The astute reader will have noticed by now that the authors have done nothing in the way of explaining why anyone would ever need to know this stuff. These sections were designed to review skills and concepts that you’ve already learned. Thus, the deeper applications are in the main body of the text as opposed to here in Chapter 0.
We close this section with an example of how the properties in Theorem 0.3 are used in Calculus. Here, ` ‘ is the Greek letter `epsilon’ and it represents a positive real number. Those of you who will be taking Calculus in the future should become very familiar with this type of algebraic manipulation.
‘ is the Greek letter `epsilon’ and it represents a positive real number. Those of you who will be taking Calculus in the future should become very familiar with this type of algebraic manipulation.
      ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \[ \begin{array}{rclr} \left| \dfrac{8-4x}{3} \right| & < & \varepsilon & \\ [12pt] \dfrac{|8 - 4x|}{|3|} & < & \varepsilon & \text{Quotient Rule}\\ [12pt] \dfrac{|-4(x-2)|}{3} & < & \varepsilon & \text{Factor} \\ [12pt] \dfrac{|-4| |x-2|}{3} & < & \varepsilon & \text{Product Rule} \\ [12pt] \dfrac{4 |x-2|}{3} & < & \varepsilon & \\ [12pt] \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \dfrac{4 |x-2|}{3} & < & \dfrac{3}{4} \cdot \varepsilon & \text{Multiply by $\dfrac{3}{4}$} \\ [12pt] |x -2 | & < & \dfrac{3}{4} \varepsilon & \\ \end{array}\]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-799bba944e66b982e52fb12a70b9ad1a_l3.png)
0.6.3 Section Exercises
In Exercises 1 – 18, solve the given inequality. Write your answer using interval notation.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com 2t - 7 \leq \sqrt[3]{18} t](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-d143d2f54c6cbacc76ca51933c001225_l3.png) 
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com 117y \geq y\sqrt{2} - 7y \sqrt[4]{8}](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-5ab7b545beb61ff075568ef287832340_l3.png) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 or or 
 or or 
 or or 
In Exercises 19 – 30, solve the inequality. Write your answer using interval notation.
Section 0.6 Exercise Answers can be found in the Appendix … Coming soon
- Using set-builder notation, our `set' of solutions here is  . ↵ . ↵
- If we intersect the solution sets of the two individual inequalities, we get the answer, too: ![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \left(-\infty, \frac{5}{3}\right] \cap \left(\frac{3}{7}, \infty\right) = \left( \frac{3}{7}, \frac{5}{3} \right]](https://odp.library.tamu.edu/app/uploads/quicklatex/quicklatex.com-ca687dd33aeffcead5a2f0000a989e19_l3.png) . ↵ . ↵
- As a result of  , it stands to reason that , it stands to reason that and thus and thus . ↵ . ↵
- Don't forget to change the direction of the inequality! ↵
- Note the use of parentheses:  as opposed to as opposed to . ↵ . ↵
- Do you see why? ↵
 
					










